NYSE Arca filed to move the already-listed Bitwise 10 crypto index ETF onto the exchange’s generic Commodity-Based Trust Share rules.
The Commission published the notice in the Federal Register on November 3, 2026, as Release No. 34-106772, File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2026-106.
This is a listing-wrapper change for an existing product, not approval of a new fund. Bitcoin already accounted for about three-quarters of the trust on September 30.
What NYSE Arca Filed for This Crypto Index ETF
NYSE Arca filed the proposal on October 21, 2026. The Commission dated its notice October 29 and published it on November 3 at 91 FR 69283.
The change would list shares of the Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF under Rule 8.201-E, the generic Commodity-Based Trust Shares standard, instead of Rule 8.500-E, which covers Trust Units.
The Commission first approved the product’s listing under the Trust Units rule on July 22, 2025, in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 103531, published at 90 FR 35339 on July 25, 2025. Shares began trading on NYSE Arca on December 9, 2025, under the ticker BITW.
The latest filing was made under Section 19(b)(3)(A)(iii) of the Exchange Act and Rule 19b-4(f)(6). It is immediately effective, but it normally does not become operative until 30 days after the filing date unless the Commission designates a shorter period. The November 3 notice does not say that clock was shortened, so the standard period after October 21 would run to about November 20, 2026. The Commission may temporarily suspend the change within 60 days of the filing. Comments are due on or before November 24, 2026, using file number SR-NYSEARCA-2026-106.
Bitcoin Still Anchors the Bitwise 10 Portfolio
The fund’s Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2026 identifies the registrant as Bitwise 10 Crypto Index ETF, Commission File No. 001-42994, sponsored by Bitwise Investment Advisers, LLC. It tracks the Bitwise 10 Large Cap Crypto Index and rebalances monthly.
As of September 30, the trust held 6,701.3246 bitcoin with a fair value of about $559.9 million, or 74.79 percent of shareholders’ equity. Ethereum was 14.54 percent, XRP 4.21 percent, Solana 3.07 percent, and the remaining six holdings together about 3.39 percent. Net assets were about $748.7 million, or $55.04 a share, with 13,601,947 shares outstanding on September 30 and 13,461,947 on November 1, 2026.

Those weights are a September 30 snapshot, not a live portfolio. Over the first nine months of 2026, net assets declined from about $1.03 billion at year-end 2025 as the trust recorded large share redemptions and market values moved. Bitcoin units also fell from 8,836.1188 at the end of 2025. Even after that shrinkage, Bitcoin remained the core holding.
Bitwise Index Services later published the October 2026 rebalance of the tracked index after the close on October 29, adding NEAR Protocol and removing Uniswap. Those index weights are not the September 30 fund holdings, and later official filings should confirm whether the changes appear in the portfolio.
How the Generic Commodity-Trust Rules Differ
Rule 8.201-E is the generic commodity-trust standard NYSE Arca amended on July 28, 2026, in Securities Exchange Act Release No. 106001, published at 91 FR 48462 on July 31, 2026, File No. SR-NYSEARCA-2026-42.
Those amendments allow a trust to hold up to 15 percent of net asset value in digital commodities or securities that do not otherwise meet the core listing tests, define a “digital commodity,” and permit actively managed Commodity-Based Trust Shares.
Moving BITW into that category does not list a new bitcoin product. It houses an existing Bitcoin-majority crypto index ETF under the same generic playbook the exchange already uses for commodity trusts.
That is a different event from the Texas Stock Exchange’s accelerated approval to adopt venue-wide generic Commodity-Based Trust Share standards, also published in the Federal Register on November 3. The Texas order opened a faster path for qualifying products on a newer exchange. This filing changes the listing wrapper around one fund that already trades on NYSE Arca.
Bitcoin’s Price Backdrop Around the Filing

Bitcoin was trading near $75,788 on Sunday, November 8, according to CoinGecko data retrieved at 21:24 Asia/Jerusalem. That is about 8.2 percent below its level of 30 days earlier and about 2.6 percent lower over seven days.
On October 21, when NYSE Arca filed, CoinGecko’s daily print was about $82,944. On October 29, the notice date, it was about $81,274. On November 3, the publication date, it was about $76,709. Those figures describe the tape around the paperwork. They do not prove the filing moved the market.
We recently looked at a separate demand signal after U.S. spot bitcoin funds recorded about $1.28 billion of net outflows over the first five November sessions. BITW is not a single-asset spot bitcoin fund, so those figures should not be read as this product’s own creations or redemptions.
What Investors Should Watch Next
We believe the constructive reading is straightforward. A regulated vehicle whose largest holding is Bitcoin is moving onto the same generic commodity-trust category already used for other listed trusts. That is market-structure housekeeping, and it keeps Bitcoin at the center of a product brokerage accounts can already buy under the ticker BITW.
It does not guarantee inflows, a higher bitcoin price, or that the Commission will leave the change untouched. The next facts to watch are whether the filing becomes operative around November 20, what comments arrive by November 24, and whether the Commission uses its 60-day suspension window.
Bitcoin’s fixed supply does not change when an exchange updates a listing category. What does change is the rulebook around a fund that, as of the latest quarterly filing, still kept most of its value in bitcoin.
DC Forecasts is a leader in many crypto news categories, striving for the highest journalistic standards and abiding by a strict set of editorial policies. If you are interested to offer your expertise or contribute to our news website, feel free to contact us at [email protected]







Discussion about this post